“We find a correlation between the role of anti-pluralist parties and declining academic freedom”
Dr. Angelo Vito Panaro is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Political Science at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg. He is involved in the “Academic Freedom Index” (AFI) research project, which provides a comprehensive overview of academic freedom worldwide. In this interview, he explains how the negative trend in Germany’s AFI values should be understood, why there are so many more countries with declining rather than increasing AFI values, and what can be learned from the developments in Argentina, Poland, and the United States.
Dr Angelo Vito Panaro is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Political Science at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, where he collaborates with the V-Dem Institute on the “Academic Freedom Index” research project. (Foto credits: private)
According to your analysis, academic freedom in Germany declined between 2014 and 2024. Can you contextualize this development for our readers?
In the 2025 Update of the Academic Freedom Index, we identify 34 countries and territories that experienced a significant and substantial decline in academic freedom – as well as Germany and Austria, which show statistically significant, but not substantially meaningful declines in academic freedom. The result for Germany is not surprising. The German constitution protects academic freedom and the country’s Academic Freedom Index score, which captures the de facto situation, remains high as well. At the same time, there was a public outcry last year over alleged plans of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research to cut funding for academics who had publicly expressed their opinions on the conflict in Gaza, or who had criticized how university leadership and police had handled pro-Palestinian demonstrations on university campuses. These events likely played a role in lowering Germany’s score on the Academic Freedom Index, as the index values are based on expert assessments.
To reverse this trend, it is essential to protect academic freedom in Germany by ensuring institutional autonomy for universities and safeguarding academics from political pressures.
It is not only in Germany that academic freedom has fallen over the last ten years; as you mentioned, data from 34 countries and territories show statistically and substantially significant declines. Conversely, there are just eight countries in which there has been a significant increase in academic freedom over the same period. Are there cross-national developments that can explain this global trend of declining academic freedom?
Our research shows that decline and growth episodes in academic freedom are not limited to specific regions or regime types. Interesting to note, we find a correlation between the role of anti-pluralist parties and declining academic freedom. Countries where anti-pluralist parties hold a large share of seats in the legislature tend to have lower levels of academic freedom. However, this trend is only evident when anti-pluralist parties are in government, and not merely in opposition.
In short, our research suggests that anti-pluralist parties in power act as a key driver of academic freedom declines. Importantly, while anti-pluralist parties in opposition may not directly affect academic freedom, their electoral success may still pose a threat to free science. As their electoral success increases, so does their likelihood of gaining access to government in the future, thereby potentially leading to detrimental effects on academic freedom.
In your current analysis, you also took a closer look at three countries in the context of case studies: Argentina, Poland and the United States. What was the reason for this selection and what can be learned from these three case studies?
The 2025 Update highlights the link between anti-pluralist parties and declines in academic freedom. We decided to select three countries – Argentina, Poland, and the Unites States – to illustrate how these parties, once in power, undermine academic freedom. Based on these examples we point out that anti-pluralist politicians use similar tactics across different country contexts, namely restrictive legislation, aggressive rhetoric, and politically motivated withdrawal of funding.
Argentina is a recent addition to the list of decliners, with a sharp reduction of academic freedom that coincides with the victory of President Milei in the 2024 elections. As a new decliner, this clear connection warrants deeper investigation for the future of academic freedom in the country.
In the U.S., the decline in academic freedom has been gradual, but recent government actions contributed to a sharp escalation. These efforts threaten institutional autonomy, academic exchange, and freedom of research. Given the global influence of U.S. universities, any erosion of academic freedom there will have far-reaching consequences, including here in Europe. For this reason, the U.S. case requires close attention.
Poland offers another clear but also hopeful example. After the PiS government gained power in 2015, academic freedom declined substantially. The government introduced controls over academic research and teaching and promoted conservative values over cultural pluralism. More recently, however, the new Polish government led by Donald Tusk took measures to improve academic freedom. This example highlights that academic freedom declines are reversible.
About the person
Dr. Angelo Vito Panaro is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Political Science at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, where he collaborates with the V-Dem Institute on the “Academic Freedom Index” research project. Prior to joining FAU, Angelo was a postdoctoral researcher at Bielefeld University (2023-2024) and a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Milan (2021-2023). From 2019 to 2024 he also served as an adjunct professor in the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the University of Bologna. His research interests include authoritarianism, democratic backsliding, comparative welfare states, social policy, global redistribution, and socio-economic inequality.
About the project
The Academic Freedom Index (AFI) covers 179 countries and territories, and provides the most comprehensive dataset on the subject of academic freedom to date. It rests on assessments by 2,363 country experts worldwide, standardized questionnaires, and a well-established statistical model, implemented and adapted by the V-Dem project. The V-Dem project is known for generating sound data on various dimensions of democracy. The Academic Freedom Index uses this method for data aggregation: it not only provides so-called point estimates, but also transparently reports measurement uncertainty in the global assessment of academic freedom. For more details on the AFI methodology, see the AFI website.
Jan Kercher has been working at the DAAD since 2013 and is project manager for the annual publication Wissenschaft weltoffen. In addition, he is responsible at the DAAD for various other projects on the exchange between higher education research and higher education practice as well as the implementation of study and data collection projects on academic mobility and the internationalisation of higher education institutions.